My Cart
Orders ship from the US within 24 hours (weekends/holidays excluded).
Suggested Item
By clicking checkout you agree to our Terms and Services Charges will appear as POPPY on your statements.
I did not grow up wanting to work in the coffee, wine, or spirits industry.
That matters because most stories about sensory expertise begin with desire. Passion. Obsession. The kid who wanted to be a taster. The teenager is already talking about flavors. The early calling.
Mine was quieter.
I grew up inside aroma before I ever tried to understand it.
Coffee was not a drink in my childhood. It was a smell. A constant presence. Something that lived in the background, the way engine grease lives in a mechanic’s home or fermenting fruit lives in a cellar. It was simply there, woven into daily life, travel, and conversations that were not meant for me but happened around me anyway.
My father was a coffee maker, a professional coffee blender, and a coffee buyer. Anything that had to do with acquiring coffee and processing it, he was involved in. Sourcing, evaluation, purchasing, production oversight, blending, and quality control were not separate jobs. They were one continuous responsibility.
Because of that, coffee followed us everywhere.
I lived in Tanzania, Japan, and Switzerland. Three countries with very different relationships to coffee, yet all deeply tied to discipline, quality, and process.
In Tanzania, coffee was close to the source. Agricultural and physical. You smelled green coffee beans before you ever thought about flavor. You saw the people handling them. Coffee was not romantic. It was work. Timing. Climate. Harvest decisions. A coffee buyer in Moshi points at clouds, calculating rain. Conversations about whether to pick Tuesday or wait until Thursday, a choice that would show up in the cup six months later, thousands of miles away.
In Japan, coffee was precise. The tasting room in Kobe, where every spoon was positioned at the same angle. The way my father’s colleagues rinsed their mouths between samples with the same rhythm, the same tilt of the head. Repetition without boredom. Refinement instead of shortcuts.
In Switzerland, coffee was controlled and consistent. This is where blending began to make sense to me, even if I did not yet have the words for it. Coffee had to taste the same year after year, even though the raw material never was. A Brazilian lot might be earthy one harvest, cleaner the next. An Ethiopian coffee could arrive jammy or dried, depending on processing delays that no one could fully control. My father kept notebooks tracking how each origin behaved across seasons, building a working map of variability so he could compose stability.
Because my father moved across all these worlds, coffee was never discussed as a finished product. It was discussed as a system. If something tasted wrong in the cup, the question was never just what went wrong, but where and why. Origin. Lot selection. Storage. Roast development. Blend architecture. Timing.
As a child, I did not understand the technical vocabulary. But I understood the logic.
My father was not only a blender. That distinction matters.
He bought coffee. He evaluated green lots. He worked with producers and origins long before coffee ever reached a roaster. Buying coffee was not about trends or novelty. It was about anticipation. How would this coffee behave during roasting? Through blending. Through time.
He fabricated coffee. That meant translating agricultural variability into something stable and repeatable. Understanding what the raw material could do and just as importantly, what it could not.
Blending was not an abstract exercise. It was the final expression of dozens of upstream decisions. It was where sourcing, roast development, and time came together.
Because he was involved at every stage, taste was never treated as an opinion. Taste was an outcome. A record of every decision that came before.
Some of my earliest memories are aromatic, not visual.
Green coffee beans have a smell most people never notice. Slightly vegetal. Dry. Sometimes faintly sweet. Sometimes dusty. It does not demand attention, but once you know it, it stays with you.
Roasting coffee is different. The room changes. The air thickens. Sugars caramelize. Acids shift. Aromas appear and disappear in waves. There is a moment, I learned to recognize it around age seven, when the roast smells alive, open, almost floral. Minutes later, that window closes. The brightness darkens. You cannot get it back.
I spent time around coffee torrefaction without knowing the word. I did not need the word. I had the smell.
Weekends often meant going with my father to tasting labs. Not because he wanted to teach me, but because that was where he was, and I wanted to be with him.
I would sit quietly while he and his team sampled coffees. Cups aligned. Spoons clinking. Notes exchanged. Conversations about balance, defects, freshness, roast curves, and origin character. Adult conversations. Technical conversations. Conversations are not adjusted for a child’s understanding.
No one asked me what I thought.
And yet, I absorbed everything.
What mattered just as much did not happen in labs.
It happened at home.
When my father drank wine with my mother, there was a simple ritual that repeated itself. He would pass me the glass and ask one question.
What do you smell?
Not what do you like? Not what is it. Just what do you smell?
Sometimes I had no answer. Sometimes I guessed wildly. Grass for a Sancerre that turned out to be right by accident. Pencil shavings for a Barolo that made him smile. Sometimes I was wrong. None of that mattered. There was no correction. No pressure. No lesson disguised as a test.
Just encouragement to pay attention.
Taste this. Smell that. Try to figure out what is in it.
It was never forced. Never framed as education. It happened by osmosis, the same way coffee had.
At the time, it felt insignificant. In hindsight, it was foundational.
This is where coffee quietly became something else.
Without realizing it, I was learning that aromas come from somewhere. They are not random. They are not magic. They are the result of raw material, transformation, and time.
Coffee taught me that aroma could come from origin, from processing, from heat, from age. A Kenyan coffee could smell like blackcurrant because of the varietal and terroir, or like tomato stem because fermentation ran a few hours too long. Roast could reveal chocolate or burn it into ash. Age could soften edges or turn brightness into cardboard.
Wine later fit perfectly into that structure.
Terroir. Grape varietal. Fermentation. Winemaking choices. Maturation. Each stage leaves a mark. Each stage contributes aroma.
Spirits did the same.
Grain selection. Fermentation style. Yeast behavior. Distillation choices. Cut points. Maturation environment. Time in wood.
Nothing was foreign. Nothing felt abstract.
Coffee had already taught me how to think sensorially in layers.
Most people misunderstand tasting.
They think it is talent. A good nose. A gift. In reality, tasting is mostly acquired. Training. Repetition. Memory. Calibration.
Very rarely, it is a gift.
And when it is, it does not announce itself as interest or passion. It announces itself as familiarity. As easy. As the absence of confusion.
That is what happened to me.
I did not chase sensory work. I did not study tasting early. I did not try to become anything. But when I later found myself in tasting rooms for wine and spirits, something felt normal.
Smells made sense. Structures felt familiar. Conversations felt like ones I had heard before.
I was not discovering a new world. I was recognizing an old one.
No one ever told me I had to be good at this.
There were no expectations. No pressure. No identity tied to performance.
Under pressure, perception narrows. You start reaching for vocabulary instead of sensation. You perform tasting instead of doing it.
In a zero pressure environment, curiosity stays intact. Memory forms naturally. Patterns connect without effort.
My father never tried to turn me into a taster. He lived his craft seriously and invited attention without obligation.
Time did the rest.
When you are young, time works for you.
You encounter the same smells year after year without urgency. A coffee from Yirgacheffe appears one February, then the next, then again. You do not try to memorize it. At some point, it stops being new. It becomes a reference.
Later in life, time becomes scarce. People want shortcuts. Frameworks without foundations. Vocabulary before memory.
But sensory skill does not work that way. You can accelerate training, but you cannot remove time. Time is part of the process.
The irony is that my father understood this perfectly and never said it out loud.
I did not end up working in coffee professionally.
And yet, coffee is everywhere in what I do.
Understanding raw material. Recognizing balance. Identifying defects. Knowing how transformation changes aroma. Understanding that every upstream decision affects what appears downstream.
These are not coffee skills. They are sensory skills.
Coffee was the blueprint.
Wine and spirits were the latter chapters.
Only much later did I realize my father had been preparing me all along, without intending to.
Not through instruction. Not through pressure. Through presence.
By respecting the entire chain.
By trusting time.
By encouraging attention without expectation.
That kind of inheritance does not announce itself. You notice it when you find yourself comfortable in places others find intimidating. When someone describes a whisky as having new make character showing through the wood, and you understand immediately, not because you studied it, but because you learned long ago that young things taste different than mature things, that coverage takes time, that some characteristics cannot be hidden, only integrated.
When people ask how I learned sensory work, the honest answer is that I did not, at least not consciously.
I lived it first.
I understood it later.
And it all began with coffee.
Sébastien Gavillet is COO of Wine Aromas - Le Nez du Vin. A renowned wine and whisky expert, winemaker, and distiller, Sébastien has been working with Le Nez du Vin for over 25 years. He is the author of Discovering and Mastering Single Malt Scotch Whisky and the International Whisky Guide series. He serves as a panel chair and examiner for The Council of Whiskey Masters, shaping global tasting standards and mentoring the next generation of spirits professionals.
Powered By: